Britain’s trade options after Brexit – no easy way out

LONDON, June 13 Britain’s status as a trade
power has become one of the most contentious issues in the
European Union membership referendum on June 23.

The uncertain outlook for exporters, and the implications
for investment in Britain, are driving much of the nervousness
in financial markets where the pound has weakened sharply.

“In” campaigners, led by Prime Minister David Cameron, warn
that Britain’s economy would suffer if it lost its unfettered
access to the EU’s single market of over 500 million consumers.

Britain would lack negotiating muscle for any new deal, they
say, because 44 percent of its exports go to the EU compared
with 8 percent of the EU’s exports that go to Britain.

On its own, Britain would also struggle to secure deals with
non-EU countries, the “In” camp says.

By contrast, “Out” campaigners say the EU would do a deal
with Britain because of its importance as an export market.

It also says Britain would strike deals with other nations,
such as the United States and China, more quickly than the EU
with its 28 member countries and their different priorities.

Below is a summary of the various trade options for Britain
in the event of a so-called Brexit.


Many Brexit supporters, among them former London mayor Boris
Johnson, point to a recently agreed deal between Canada and the
EU as a possible model for a post-Brexit Britain.

Under the Canada model, Britain would no longer have to
allow in workers from across the bloc or pay into its budget,
two unpopular EU requirements among voters.

But the Canada deal, which took over a decade to negotiate,
involves only a partial opening up of the market for services,
which make up nearly 80 percent of Britain’s economy. Banks
would not have the same kind access to the EU they do now.

Finance minister George Osborne says such an agreement would
leave Britain’s economy 6.2 percent smaller by 2030 than it
would be if it stayed in the EU.


Norway has a trade deal that gives it access to the single
market, as part of the European Economic Area. A deal like that
would allow British-based banks to carry on doing business in
the EU.

But Norway accepts free movement of EU nationals and pays a
contribution to the EU budget as large as Britain’s, when
measured per person, two of the things British “Out” supporters
most resent about EU membership.

Norway also has to accept the EU’s single market rules and
regulations without a having a say in making them.


Switzerland has bilateral deals with the EU which give it
access to bits of the single market in return for a fee, but it
does not have the right to provide cross-border financial
services. Big Swiss banks have set up subsidiaries in EU
countries, adding to their costs.

Switzerland also adopts EU rules in the areas in which it
has single market access and accepts the free movement of EU
citizens although a vote in favour of restrictions, at a
referendum in 2014, has jeopardised Swiss-EU economic ties.


Brexit supporters say German car exporters or French
wine-makers would press their capitals to do a deal with Britain
rather than punish it for leaving. But if the price of a broad
deal was the continued free movement of people and budget
contributions, a less ambitious arrangement might be struck.

British justice minister and “Out” campaigner Michael Gove
says Britain could strike a deal with the EU similar to ones
reached by Bosnia, Serbia, Albania and Ukraine. “In” supporters
say those deals are no model for Britain’s much bigger economy
and do not cover non-tariff barriers such as standards.

German finance minister Wolfgang Schaeuble said on June 10
that Britain would not be able to continue to benefit from the
single market like Norway or Switzerland if it quit the EU.


Britain could fall back on World Trade Organisation rules to
govern its relationship with the EU if it cannot strike a deal.

“Out” supporters say import tariffs on most goods traded
between rich economies have been cut to very low levels.

But the EU has higher tariff levels on some goods including
a nearly 10 percent duty on automobiles, an industry which
employs about 800,000 people in Britain. Cutting tariffs
unilaterally would leave some sectors facing fierce competition.

Furthermore, the WTO has not yet significantly opened up
global trade in services. British exports would face non-tariff
barriers such as rules of origin and other red tape.

WTO boss Roberto Azevedo has said Britain might take several
years to renegotiate its relationship with other WTO members.


A solo Britain would try to strike its own trade deals with
countries beyond the EU, including more than 50 which have trade
deals with the bloc. The “Out” camp says it would focus on big
markets with which the EU currently does not have a deal, such
as the United States and China. But in April, U.S. President
Barack Obama said Britain would go to the “back of the queue” in
U.S. trade talks if it left the EU. The United States and the EU
are trying to conclude a wide-ranging trade and investment deal.

(Writing by William Schomberg; additional reporting by Paul
Taylor in Paris, Philip Blenkinsop in Brussels, Tom Miles in
Geneva and Costas Pitas in London; Editing by Robin Pomeroy)

This article is automatically posted by WP-AutoPost Plugin

Source URL:


BRIEF-Moody's says Euro Area's economic recovery supports stable 2018 outlook

January 15, 2018 mmayha 0



RPT-Germany to include yuan in FX reserves – c.banker

January 15, 2018 mmayha 0

(Repeats to more subscribers) HONG KONG, Jan 15 (Reuters) – Germany’s central bank has decided to include China’s currency, the yuan, in its foreign exchange reserves, Bundesbank board member Andreas Dombret said in Hong Kong […]


Singapore files more charges against Shell oil theft suspects

January 15, 2018 mmayha 0

SINGAPORE (Reuters) – A Singapore court on Monday filed additional charges against nine men accused in a large-scale oil theft at Shell’s biggest refinery, the latest development in an extensive investigation in the city-state. The […]

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply